X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:13:18 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2637480@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <marknlisa@hometel.com>
Received: from smtp164.iad.emailsrvr.com ([207.97.245.164] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4)
  with ESMTP id 2637446 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:09:44 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.97.245.164; envelope-from=marknlisa@hometel.com
Received: from relay6.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by relay6.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8B8656F5A4B
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed,  9 Jan 2008 08:09:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hometel.com (webmail22.webmail.iad.mlsrvr.com [192.168.1.19])
	by relay6.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8748A6F5A40
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed,  9 Jan 2008 08:09:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: by webmail.hometel.com
    (Authenticated sender: marknlisa@hometel.com, from: marknlisa@hometel.com) 
    with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:09:04 -0600 (CST)
X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:09:04 -0600 (CST)
Subject: RE:water ingestion in rain and engine stoppage
From: marknlisa@hometel.com
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Reply-To: marknlisa@hometel.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;boundary="----=_20080109070904_61458"
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Type: 2
X-Original-Message-ID: <46145.192.168.1.70.1199884144.webmail@192.168.1.70>
X-Mailer: webmail6.5.1

------=_20080109070904_61458
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=0A=0AGerard,=0A=0A =0A=0AI believe you have found another example of the n=
otoriously poorly written technical guidance we all suffered through in tha=
t era. =0A=0A =0A=0AWhat the writer said:=0A=0A =0A=0A"the use of carbureto=
r heat in heavy rain is recommended both to prevent build of of carb ice an=
d to avoid engine stoppage"=0A=0A =0A=0AWhat I'm fairly certain the writer =
meant to say:=0A=0A =0A=0A"the use of carburetor heat in heavy rain is reco=
mmended to prevent the build up of carb ice and possible engine stoppage"=
=0A=0A =0A=0AThe engine stoppage you are meant to avoid would be subsequent=
 to the carb icing you are trying to prevent with carb heat.=0A=0A =0A=0AIf=
 there is enough water entering the carb to kill the engine I don't think c=
arb heat is going to help much...=0A=0A =0A=0ARegards,=0A=0A =0A=0AMark
------=_20080109070904_61458
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<font face=3D"arial" size=3D"2"><DIV><BR>Gerard,</DIV>=0A<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>=
=0A<DIV>I believe you have found another example of the notoriously&nbsp;po=
orly written technical guidance we all suffered through in that era. </DIV>=
=0A<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>=0A<DIV>What the writer said:</DIV>=0A<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>=
=0A<DIV>"the use of carburetor heat in heavy rain is recommended both to pr=
event build of of carb ice and to avoid engine stoppage"</DIV>=0A<DIV>&nbsp=
;</DIV>=0A<DIV>What I'm fairly certain the writer&nbsp;meant to say:</DIV>=
=0A<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>=0A<DIV>"the use of carburetor heat in heavy rain is re=
commended to prevent the build up of carb ice and&nbsp;possible engine stop=
page"</DIV>=0A<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>=0A<DIV>The engine stoppage you are meant to=
 avoid would be subsequent to the carb icing you are trying to prevent with=
 carb heat.</DIV>=0A<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>=0A<DIV>If there is enough water enter=
ing the carb to kill the engine I don't think carb heat is going to help mu=
ch...</DIV>=0A<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>=0A<DIV>Regards,</DIV>=0A<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>=
=0A<DIV>Mark</DIV></font>
------=_20080109070904_61458--