X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:23:49 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web36605.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.22] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with SMTP id 2605938 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:15:56 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.191.85.22; envelope-from=wfhannahan@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 32527 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Dec 2007 23:15:17 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ApRx6Zyb55ufTOWaSQMN7SEJpCbj1HnOUEXyc+b+r+hrpcwiu88Bt1GQWoqKX9DK1qQOqB8yn6k2txYDgIQ10BrsWYC7rLuswSJwwznN/YF6f8+6NMn83M8DTOwpekOoGexid2KbbT+bs21lFnY/UlZbWGSWnqH/919i4ttQK7s=; X-YMail-OSG: xutflmEVM1lpZ94cBz6ZL2dlqokdB7MIsWUGyDMpyrfiaZqcT0JxNpecqoLSCT3.4qWQkSFw9AmvXh8_FVPi2rFSCGuu4DAgDTxHvTZtOdsx_FJXULytv2ZNktP21A-- Received: from [71.208.37.93] by web36605.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:15:17 PST X-Original-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:15:17 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Hannahan Subject: [LML] 320/360 efficiency and economy - hole in the market? X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-474225916-1198106117=:32094" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Original-Message-ID: <490041.32094.qm@web36605.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --0-474225916-1198106117=:32094 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I agree Fred. My 360 has flown from Longmont CO, north of Denver, to Lakeland nonstop four times, and back nonstop once. On two of those trips I had a passenger. We planned to stop whenever we got hungry or needed a pit stop, but never did. A friend offered to give me a ride to Sun N Fun in his IVP. I explained that it would cost me more to buy half the gas for his 4, so he rode with me. Fred Moreno wrote: I have been pondering Lorn’s commentary about how his 320 cannot be beat for efficient and cost effective cross country cruising. With oil probably permanently above $70-80/bbl and avgas at $5 a gallon, he makes an excellent point. Efficiency (particularly cost efficiency) should be a key figure of merit. However, Lancair has gone upscale and offers only expensive, fire-breathing kit airplanes. This list has noted that a Legacy starts at $200K completed, and works up. Has Lancair left a hole in the market place? If one could produce a relatively simple, fast and efficient lower cost kit for 320/360 engines, is there a currently untapped market? The most efficient cross country airplane I have found is the Dyn-Aero MCR Sporter which has one kit version (short wings) that carries two people at 160 knots on 100 Rotax horsepower – fixed gear no less. But it lacks the sex and beauty of the Lancair family airplanes. And we all know that airplanes have to be beautiful, particularly after all that labor. Is it time to bring back the Lancair 320, upgraded, simpler, even slicker, and keep it inexpensive? Ever curious Fred Regards, Bill Hannahan wfhannahan@yahoo.com --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. --0-474225916-1198106117=:32094 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit  
I agree Fred. My 360 has flown from Longmont CO, north of Denver, to Lakeland nonstop four times, and back nonstop once. On two of those trips I had a passenger. We planned to stop whenever we got hungry or needed a pit stop, but never did.
 
A friend offered to give me a ride to Sun N Fun in his IVP. I explained that it would cost me more to buy half the gas for his 4, so he rode with me.


Fred Moreno <fredmoreno@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
I have been pondering Lorn’s commentary about how his 320 cannot be beat for efficient and cost effective cross country cruising. 
 
With oil probably permanently above $70-80/bbl and avgas at $5 a gallon, he makes an excellent point.  Efficiency (particularly cost efficiency) should be a key figure of merit. 
 
However, Lancair has gone upscale and offers only expensive, fire-breathing kit airplanes.   This list has noted that a Legacy starts at $200K completed, and works up. 
 
Has Lancair left a hole in the market place? 
 
If one could produce a relatively simple, fast and efficient lower cost kit for 320/360 engines, is there a currently untapped market? 
 
The most efficient cross country airplane I have found is the Dyn-Aero MCR Sporter which has one kit version (short wings) that carries two people at 160 knots on 100 Rotax horsepower – fixed gear no less.  But it lacks the sex and beauty of the Lancair family airplanes.  And we all know that airplanes have to be beautiful, particularly after all that labor.
 
Is it time to bring back the Lancair 320, upgraded, simpler, even slicker, and keep it inexpensive?
 
Ever curious Fred



Regards,
Bill Hannahan


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. --0-474225916-1198106117=:32094--