X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:50:13 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web82714.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.201.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with SMTP id 2605268 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:25:04 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.201.28; envelope-from=earleschroeder@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 66057 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Dec 2007 15:24:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=e4vIpVqZvkDlCIdCzGdIF14+/KvlM0qP79gGEQgyiumniUoJHjEQVRjNE4CCiaZ0Dm8YXHefVXi3RnEAElkXaTqz19+HAODJnIkdiHyXpxkrM7RFF+9X9db8DJ/CftJJ2IDi3FNm25i9uI4Lwi/xo8sZTyW++7jHwnU3CIhzUa0=; X-YMail-OSG: 8KjxpVIVM1ngBaQoybzAbIVpLt4rWOB3t4LRX30rkj0s61Cn5ICjDwn_UdFe008SQA-- Received: from [75.16.237.216] by web82714.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:24:09 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/818.31 YahooMailWebService/0.7.158.1 X-Original-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:24:09 -0800 (PST) From: Earl Schroeder Subject: Re: [LML] 320/360 efficiency and economy - hole in the market? X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-597491211-1198077849=:65555" X-Original-Message-ID: <545711.65555.qm@web82714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --0-597491211-1198077849=:65555 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ----- Original Message ---- From: Fred Moreno Is it time to bring back the Lancair 320, upgraded, simpler, even slicker, and keep it inexpensive? Ever curious Fred Hi Fred, if you are looking for opinions... I'd vote YES! Earl [flying a 235/320 - a lot of bang for the buck too] --0-597491211-1198077849=:65555 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

----- Original Message ----

From: Fred Moreno <fredmoreno@optusnet.com.au>

Is it time to bring back the Lancair 320, upgraded, simpler, even slicker, and keep it inexpensive?

Ever curious Fred

Hi Fred, if you are looking for opinions... I'd vote YES! Earl [flying a 235/320 - a lot of bang for the buck too]

--0-597491211-1198077849=:65555--