Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #45380
From: Laznicka, Garry [MCCUS] <GLaznic@MCCUS.JNJ.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: 320/360 Elevator RIGGING
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:28:03 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Dear Friend,
 
Thank you all who responded with help to my question. Really appreciate it. Have a great Holidays.
 
Regards,
Garry V. Laznicka
L-360c 86%
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Edwards [mailto:gary21sn@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 4:43 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: 320/360 Elevator RIGGING

I believe the purpose is to have the bob-weight horizontal as much as possible, so it can do what it was designed to do.  In the vertical position, it has a lot less effect.  So, with that, closer to the control rod is good.  Also, the more vertical it is, the more it may be in conflict with other items.  Check for clearance in the vertical position as it could contact the hat shelf close out panel.
 
Gary Edwards
LNC2
Medford, Oregon
Hi Garry,

Glad to hear that you're still working on your 360. I would consider the
1/4" figure in the manual to be a minimum.  We certainly don't want the lead
weight to be hammering the push rod.  I believe that anything (within
reason) more than 1/4" would be acceptable.

Since you're rigging the controls, you must be getting close to flight, eh?

Bill Harrelson
N5ZQ 320 1,450 hrs
N6ZQ  IV under construction



Looking at the page 15-28 Rev 6/04-01-99 in "Lancair 320FB manual" where
Figure-9a is depicted, it's specified there that with full elevator down (11
degrees) the Elevator Idler arm (which supports the Bob weight) to be 1/4"
from Rear push/pull tube. My question is:

Would that be acceptable to have this distance at 0.59"
Or is it absolutely critical that I have it at 0.25"

I am maxed out on push-rods travel at this point.

Thank you in advance for your suggestions and advice.
Regards,
Garry V. Laznicka
L-360c 85%
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster