Return-Path: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from hotmail.com ([216.33.237.113]) by truman.olsusa.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35)
          with SMTP id com for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>;
          Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:09:18 -0500
Received: (qmail 65014 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jan 2000 15:14:28 -0000
Received: from 216.85.213.112 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:14:28 PST
Message-ID: <20000128151428.65013.qmail@hotmail.com>
From: "Micah Froese" <mfroese@hotmail.com>
To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Subject: painting
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:14:28 PST
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Mime-Version: 1.0

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
While on the subject of painting, does anyone have experience with HVLP 
spray guns.  I see them advertised in various Homebuilding magazines and 
wonder if they are capable of the quality a Lancair, or similar aircraft 
deserve. Some are even advertised as having two outputs, one for the spray 
gun and one for the operator.

Micah Froese


{It is my understanding that the HVLP guns which operate with shop air are
less desirable than the ones that use a dedicated HVLP air delivery system
such as the one you described.  It would seem to me that if one were going
to be painting with the toxic paints (ie, urethanes, Imron, etc) that
getting an air source capable of handling both life support as well as the
sprayer would be an excellent choice.  They are pricey buggers, though,
aren't they?               <Marv>             ]  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>