X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:17:48 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web54406.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.136] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c1) with SMTP id 2552507 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:47:39 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.49.136; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 68615 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Dec 2007 00:47:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=qO+IPmPZ+jw78w08UF06iWVUwOALUbxqprNSwxRIjXQxhHrkrtlXhRuuU36qezDnPL6nOh1PN13roH397mC93KAQFkHDzs6Q0cYphP+s966GG8th5KEG5xQuCN2VgB6Gkg0wuXE1vUzxwTtg00RN9EVsQ1biV2hiP3ZHTjkq40Y=; X-YMail-OSG: dnFDMBgVM1nuNexKFiMI7nVau4sZJRHbJV4qBjjJ2pIjblAn.EYBtwmDkxYC_O75CQ-- Received: from [76.8.220.18] by web54406.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:47:02 PST X-Original-Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 16:47:02 -0800 (PST) From: randy snarr Subject: Re: [LML] Re: limit Gs for 235 (kit #11) X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-913844985-1196642822=:68222" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Original-Message-ID: <96158.68222.qm@web54406.mail.yahoo.com> --0-913844985-1196642822=:68222 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Terrence, I know for a fact that the main spar is significantly beefier in the 3 series than the 235. Not sure on the outer spars but I would imagine the same is true. My 235 came with the 320 spars (purchased by previous builder) and I have seen other 235's under construction and they appear to be the same dimensionally but with more carbon. I would guess in the neighborhood of 25-30% more material. That being said, I would have had no issues about using the original spars if that is what I ended up with. I do not believe you could ever break the thing unless you hit something with it. These wings are ridiculously strong. Randy L. Snarr 235/320 N694RS terrence o'neill wrote: Scott, Well,let me ask this: what are the differences between the structure of the 200's wings and that of the 300s. Mainly things like the wing spars caps, and the landing gear support structure in the wing. Ws that changed? Thanks, Terrence --------------------------------- Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now. --0-913844985-1196642822=:68222 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Terrence,
I know for a fact that the main spar is significantly beefier in the 3 series than the 235. Not sure on the outer spars but I would imagine the same is true.
My 235 came with the 320 spars (purchased by previous builder) and I have seen other 235's under construction and they appear to be the same dimensionally  but with more carbon. I would guess in the neighborhood of 25-30% more material. That being said, I would have had no issues about using the original spars if that is what I ended up with. I do not believe you could ever break the thing unless you hit something with it.
These wings are ridiculously strong.

Randy L. Snarr
235/320
N694RS

terrence o'neill <troneill@charter.net> wrote:
Scott,

Well,let me ask this:  what are the differences between the structure of the 200's wings and that of the 300s.  Mainly things like the wing spars caps, and the landing gear support structure in the wing.  Ws that changed? 
 
Thanks,  Terrence
 

Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now. --0-913844985-1196642822=:68222--