Return-Path: Received: from smtp5.gateway.net ([208.230.117.249]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 01:42:29 -0500 Received: from oemcomputer (1Cust218.tnt2.coeur-dalene.id.da.uu.net [63.20.49.218]) by smtp5.gateway.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA29730 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 01:47:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <006b01bf6180$8736ffe0$2331143f@oemcomputer> Reply-To: "dfs" From: "dfs" To: "Lancair List" Subject: CO concerns Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:52:02 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I've had one of the "stick-on" CO detectors on my panel as a matter of course. These airplanes do not have the Friendly Aviation Administration's blessing on the exhaust system and what the flow patterns around the fuselage might be. We all NEED to have some type of *Workable* CO detector on board. I had no information on whether the one I bought from AC Spruce worked or not, so initially, I bought two of them and took one and held it in the exhaust of my car. It turned black within seconds so I concluded the one on my panel was OK. The one talked about here sounds better so I'll probably get one, but I'll keep the stick-on as a back-up since it weighs, at most, a gram or so. Dan Schaefer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>