Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #41204
From: Robert Pastusek <rpastusek@htii.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Amp connectors in firewall....
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:00:24 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

John,

 

I used the Amp connectors under the assumption that by the time a fire got that far back and high in the engine compartment you’d have lots more to worry about than some defective electrical circuits. I have no hard data to support this; just an opinion.


Bob Pastusek

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of John McMahon
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:44 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Amp connectors in firewall....

 

Tom wrote...


..... Apparently some people are opting for the more expensive connectors listed in "Firewall Forward", even on non-pressurized planes, because they are more fire resistant than the Amp connectors. ......

 

I've heard this from several sources but without any specifics.  I tried to find info on temp rating or some quantitative data but have not found any nor seen any.  How about the rest of you?  Did you use the Amp connectors in your firewall of opt for something else???  Inquiring minds want to know....
 Thanks

--
John McMahon
Lancair Super ES, S/N 170, N9637M (Reserved)

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster