X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:43:44 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.237] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 1976815 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:32:05 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.162.237; envelope-from=blackoaks@gmail.com Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so1189872nzi for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:31:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=QeFXCOoVAWlT4z1zSsBFE+C3xOST7i10Honn+tT24+YSTSOt+4gIZ9IlKVzxvU3azUqdpXu0J3MIj1qvahm/yuOnDU61ZxWaSBLQCvIiSEHVW1qeezU2XtLiPfryxlPil45ZaGUQxHiCwEFJT4tTlumJP2EzYn/hFRcQqRL+teY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Nircbb4MXSmG10pBOccXUSJ6U7oYhatoiuqPrppmbOC1Y83cO6kXSrdd6YrFWUJGoigk4zVpnZlWpPKIV6JlxBV1D6FmuBvJdcBKfiIoB7dc7dwNLvu2EAX+eWuc606rVkDn2inauxk1mTniG/FVExJHXwu3iAd9yiSJOMZRoW8= Received: by 10.114.25.3 with SMTP id 3mr2629661way.1176175881061; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.81.12 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:31:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <254321ea0704092031g488224dax75d8b80e48aa525d@mail.gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:31:21 -0700 From: "John McMahon" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Amp connectors in firewall.... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_21015_21509937.1176175881018" ------=_Part_21015_21509937.1176175881018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Tom wrote... ..... Apparently some people are opting for the more expensive connectors listed in "Firewall Forward", even on non-pressurized planes, because they are more fire resistant than the Amp connectors. ...... I've heard this from several sources but without any specifics. I tried to find info on temp rating or some quantitative data but have not found any nor seen any. How about the rest of you? Did you use the Amp connectors in your firewall of opt for something else??? Inquiring minds want to know.... Thanks -- John McMahon Lancair Super ES, S/N 170, N9637M (Reserved) ------=_Part_21015_21509937.1176175881018 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Tom wrote...

..... Apparently some people are opting for the more expensive connectors listed in "Firewall Forward", even on non-pressurized planes, because they are more fire resistant than the Amp connectors. ......

I've heard this from several sources but without any specifics.  I tried to find info on temp rating or some quantitative data but have not found any nor seen any.  How about the rest of you?  Did you use the Amp connectors in your firewall of opt for something else???  Inquiring minds want to know....
 Thanks

--
John McMahon
Lancair Super ES, S/N 170, N9637M (Reserved) ------=_Part_21015_21509937.1176175881018--