X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:06:43 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.137.3] (HELO imo-m22.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1824341 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:39:23 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.3; envelope-from=PatHABU@aol.com Received: from PatHABU@aol.com by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.bd3.f72d41f (48552) for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:38:25 -0500 (EST) From: PatHABU@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:38:22 EST Subject: Canopy latch X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_bd3.f72d41f.32fcba0e_boundary" X-Mailer: Thunderbird - Mac OS X sub 291 X-Spam-Flag: NO --part1_bd3.f72d41f.32fcba0e_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reading the inputs on canopy latches for Legacy brings me to ask about latches for the early 235's/320's etc. Those four suitcase flip latches are certainly simple in design but a real pain to use. In an emergency, particularly if injured, they could be a major challenge to reach. Any modifications from the field? Pat Halloran --part1_bd3.f72d41f.32fcba0e_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reading the inputs on canopy latches fo= r Legacy brings me to ask about latches for the early 235's/320's etc. = Those four suitcase flip latches are certainly simple in design but a real= pain to use. In an emergency, particularly if injured, they c= ould be a major challenge to reach. Any modifications from the field?= Pat Halloran --part1_bd3.f72d41f.32fcba0e_boundary--