X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:09:07 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.61] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1822643 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:13:06 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.61; envelope-from=douglasbrunner@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=Q1goUMy8dWa656GxtnesZIWfhDLVJpfzk2DwwcAk6QP749e5JvBtqsgTu7Zdf7+p; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [74.93.196.177] (helo=DFWK3391) by elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HExpf-0005xa-93 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:12:15 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <001c01c74b1e$292b3cb0$1dd0a60a@DFWK3391> From: "Douglas Brunner" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Canopy Locks X-Original-Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:12:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01C74AF4.3FF5D6A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-ELNK-Trace: ad85a799c4f5de37c2eb1477c196d22294f5150ab1c16ac00228c60b5ef14b9b199e3ef198676309ff86e5b153787665350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 74.93.196.177 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C74AF4.3FF5D6A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have decided not to use the canopy latch mechanism. Most of the = canopy latches I have seen installed didn't come out all that well - the = body work around them is tough to get smooth and well blended. Instead, I will be using an outiside opening rear window, through which = I can reach the regular latch (yes, I have long arms). Anyone else thinking along these lines? D. Brunner N241DB 50% finished - 70% to go ----- Original Message -----=20 From: James Cameron=20 To: lml=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 6:35 PM Subject: [LML] Canopy Locks What is everybody using for canopy locks on the Legacy? The = factory doesn't seem to supply one, so I'm wondering how various = builders have solved this problem. On my last Legacy I used one of the = locks that comes matched to the ACS ignition switch, but it was quite a = construction project. Someone on the list mentioned a Medco (or = Medeco?) lock -- details? I need to figure this out before finishing = the body work. Jim Cameron Legacy N132X reserved ------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C74AF4.3FF5D6A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have decided not to use the canopy = latch=20 mechanism. Most of the canopy latches I have seen installed didn't = come=20 out all that well - the body work around them is tough to get smooth and = well=20 blended.

Instead, I will be using an = outiside opening=20 rear window, through which I can reach the regular latch (yes, I = have long=20 arms).

Anyone else thinking along these=20 lines?

D. Brunner

N241DB

50% finished - 70% to go

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 James = Cameron=20
To: lml

Sent: Wednesday, February 07, = 2007 6:35=20 PM

Subject: [LML] Canopy = Locks

What is everybody using = for canopy=20 locks on the Legacy? The factory doesn't seem to supply one, so = I'm=20 wondering how various builders have solved this problem. On my = last=20 Legacy I used one of the locks that comes matched to the ACS ignition = switch,=20 but it was quite a construction project. Someone on the list = mentioned a=20 Medco (or Medeco?) lock -- details? I need to figure this out = before=20 finishing the body work.

Jim Cameron

Legacy N132X reserved

------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C74AF4.3FF5D6A0--