X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:10:42 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1820266 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:21:03 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.7; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.c5a.b4a0bbc (58808) for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 21:20:04 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 21:20:02 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Bird Strike! X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1170814802" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5358 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1170814802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/6/2007 7:24:33 P.M. Central Standard Time, 5zq@cox.net writes: Interesting stuff, Scott. A little late, but still interesting :-). Bill and Sue, Au contraire, mon amis. Perhaps the outcome would have been different had you read and memorized all the titillating details when the article was first published, then changed your "Impending Bird Strike" emergency checklist. Such a checklist should always be in the hands of the co-pilot, highlighted for AGL read outs and ready to assist the FP on impact avoidance (or post strike cleanup). I know that age is catching up and information retention is being crowded out by images of the "good old days", but here one must be encouraged to engage in recurrent training and simulated bird attacks in order to stay atop one's game. Shutting one's eyes and pulling on the stick whilst voicing the phrase "circular letter excrement" just isn't the proper response. Lancair pilots fly a higher line than that. Grayhawk the irrelevant. We just keep pecking away at safety. -------------------------------1170814802 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 2/6/2007 7:24:33 P.M. Central Standard Time, 5zq@cox= .net=20 writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000=20 size=3D2>Interesting stuff, Scott. A little late, but still interesting=20 :-).
Bill and Sue,
 
Au contraire, mon amis. Perhaps the outcome would have been different h= ad=20 you read and memorized all the titillating details when the article w= as=20 first published, then changed your "Impending Bird Strike"  emergency=20 checklist.  Such a checklist should always be in the hands of the=20 co-pilot, highlighted for AGL read outs and ready to assist the FP on impact= =20 avoidance (or post strike cleanup).  I know that age is catching up and= =20 information retention is being crowded out by images of the "good old days",= but=20 here one must be encouraged to engage in recurrent training and simulated=20 bird attacks in order to stay atop one's game.  Shutting one'= s=20 eyes and pulling on the stick whilst voicing the phrase "circular=20 letter excrement" just isn't the proper response.  Lancair pilots=20= fly=20 a higher line than that.
 
Grayhawk the irrelevant.
 
We just keep pecking away at safety.
-------------------------------1170814802--