X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 51 [XX] (65%) SPAMTRICK: obfuscated phone number (35%) SPAM TRICK: contains gapped text Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:24:14 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from alnrmhc15.comcast.net ([204.127.225.95] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5) with ESMTP id 1811837 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 01:26:13 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.225.95; envelope-from=j.hafen@comcast.net Received: from hafenj1 (c-67-171-31-74.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.171.31.74]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc15) with SMTP id <20070205062516b1500g7k6me>; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 06:25:26 +0000 From: "John Hafen" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" , Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Sale of Lancair Prop Jet X-Original-Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 23:25:15 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <002201c748ee$6c880ba0$6d01a8c0@engagethoughtware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0023_01C748B3.C02ABA40" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C748B3.C02ABA40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I don't think it is a "space" issue. It's more of a "weight" issue on a 4P"T" which was what was for sale, not a 4P. -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Lancair Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 7:03 AM To: lml Subject: [LML] Re: Sale of Lancair Prop Jet Subject: [LML] Re: Sale of Lancair Prop Jet Doesn't carry enough luggage? A 4P? Might want to consider a modified ES-P. With the pressure bulkhead moved all the way aft the pressurized cabin is 50% longer than the IV-P, and there's no gear taking up baggage space. Robert M. Simon ES-P N301ES ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C748B3.C02ABA40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sale of Lancair Prop Jet

I don’t think it is a = “space” issue.  It’s more of a “weight” issue on a = 4P”T” which was what was for sale, not a 4P.

 

-----Original = Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing = List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of Lancair
Sent: Sunday, February = 04, 2007 7:03 AM
To: lml
Subject: [LML] Re: Sale = of Lancair Prop Jet

 

Subject: [LML] Re: Sale of Lancair Prop Jet

Doesn’t = carry enough luggage?  A 4P?  

 

Might want to = consider a modified ES-P.  With the pressure bulkhead moved all the way = aft the pressurized cabin is 50% longer than the IV-P, and there's no gear = taking up baggage space.

 

Robert M. = Simon

ES-P = N301ES 

------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C748B3.C02ABA40--