X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.2) with HTTP id 1566368 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 21:26:17 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: "Just the facts maam" To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.2 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 21:26:17 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <462.149b7f33.328bd18c@aol.com> References: <462.149b7f33.328bd18c@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for YoSamuel@aol.com: I've been building IVs for over 13 years, so I haven't been around since very beginning. I cannot think of a single Lancair IV crash that was cause by engine failure turbine or piston. Both engines are very reliable. I cannot think of a single crash of a IV or Legacy due to airframe failure. I don't follow the smaller Lancairs but I think they have a darn good record too. There was an engine failure problem in a Legacy crash that we can probably all agree that Shannon could have handled better in many different ways. I remember a number of flights into severe weather that weren't successful. I remember a number of stall/spin accidents. We've been through this all many times before, these are great little airplanes. All that's really required to fly them safely is good judgement. Have I missed a bunch of engine failures? Dave.