X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:07:44 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-02.rdc-kc.rr.com ([24.94.166.122] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.2) with ESMTP id 1565517 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:15:08 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.94.166.122; envelope-from=MSmith982@mn.rr.com Received: from SMITH (c-75-73-187-161.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [75.73.187.161]) by ms-smtp-02.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAELEOFc007687 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:14:28 -0600 (CST) X-Original-Message-Id: <200611142114.kAELEOFc007687@ms-smtp-02.rdc-kc.rr.com> From: "Mike Smith" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Lancair down in Georgia X-Original-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:14:31 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0034_01C707FF.96806400" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-index: AccIFGy8wtDNUVIaS42J8n+Ngk78xQAGz/dw In-reply-to: X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C707FF.96806400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hamid, To paraphrase Dennis Miller, my favorite comedian, Maybe I see life (and all the airplanes crashing) more like checkers then chess. Whatever strategy one would employ to outmaneuver a threat based on an anticipated strategy five moves beforehand- well that's chess. Checkers- jump on it and fix it right away. Regardless of cause, it seems to me there is a higher rate of turbine Lancairs crashing than the standard piston versions- some for good reasons and some for not so clear. I don't have access to exact numbers of flying type's hours and so on- but the turbine crashes have taken a front row seat. That is why one can't get turbine insurance in Minnesota. I would like to understand the why and what in that equation. I have no other agenda other than to point out what seems obvious to me. I may be wrong; I hope so. Regarding politicians (Poly- many tics-blood sucking creatures), well, I am a surgeon so I am not sure if you are trying to compliment me. Michael _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Hamid A. Wasti Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 11:43 AM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair down in Georgia Mike Smith wrote: I am not here to nitpick semantics Mike, The issue is very simple. You mad a statement. People asked you to back it up with facts. You responded by claiming that you never said what you had posted. It is not a matter of nitpicking semantics -- it is a matter of you acting like a politician and that is not acceptable behavior. Regards, Hamid -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/ ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C707FF.96806400 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hamid,

 

To paraphrase Dennis Miller, my = favorite comedian, Maybe I see life (and all the airplanes crashing) more like checkers = then chess.   Whatever strategy one would employ to outmaneuver a = threat based on an anticipated strategy five moves beforehand- well = that’s chess.  Checkers- jump on it and fix it right away.  = Regardless of cause, it seems to me there is a higher rate of turbine Lancairs = crashing than the standard piston versions- some for good reasons and some for not so = clear. I don’t have access to exact numbers of flying type’s hours = and so on- but the turbine crashes have taken a front row seat.  That is = why one can’t get turbine insurance in Minnesota.   I would like to understand the why and what in that = equation.

 

I have no other agenda other than = to point out what seems obvious to me.  I may be wrong; I hope = so.

 

Regarding politicians (Poly- many = tics-blood sucking creatures), well, I am a surgeon so I am not sure if you are = trying to compliment me. 

 

Michael

=

 


From: Lancair Mailing = List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of Hamid A. Wasti
Sent: Tuesday, November = 14, 2006 11:43 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: = Lancair down in Georgia

 

Mike Smith wrote: =

I= am not here to nitpick semantics

Mike,

The issue is very simple.  You mad a statement.  People asked = you to back it up with facts.  You responded by claiming that you never = said what you had posted.  It is not a matter of nitpicking semantics -- it = is a matter of you acting like a politician and that is not acceptable = behavior.

Regards,

Hamid

--

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
------=_NextPart_000_0034_01C707FF.96806400--