Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:59:02 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1565900@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.69.195.66; envelope-from=donaldbeam@earthlink.net
From: "DONALD W BEAM" <donaldbeam@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: for the record
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="windows-1250"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-1565029@logan.com>
Disposition-Notification-To: "DONALD W BEAM" <donaldbeam@earthlink.net>

I am actually learning from this discussion.  If I were the dead man I =
would
hope my situation might save others from a similar fate.=20

Don
=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of =
Kevin
Kossi
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:49 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: for the record

I am starting to wonder if it is a bad idea for the LML to be used as =20
a form for speculation regarding the causes of an accident, =20
especially after a death.
Would it make more sense to wait until the NTSB publicly publishes =20
their results. At which time we can have an informed dialogue where =20
we all can potentially learn something from the tragedy.


Person's and companies reputations are at stake in this.


Just my thoughts open for discussion


Kevin Kossi

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/

--=20
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.5/533 - Release Date: =
11/13/2006
8:56 PM
=20

--=20
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.5/533 - Release Date: =
11/13/2006
8:56 PM
=20