X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:59:36 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.2) with ESMTP id 1563720 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:42:57 -0500 Received: from [192.168.111.9] ([70.18.205.49]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0J8P00AGVV3AO6H0@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 04:42:46 -0600 (CST) X-Original-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:42:45 -0500 From: Kevin Kossi Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Control Surfaces In-reply-to: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Message-id: <79196D8A-8BB9-4638-B1C3-3D76DAF8CAE2@airforcemechanical.com> MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: I have started my control surfaces bodywork, On the control surfaces, do you build up their level with the surface leading it, or to the level where it meets/pivots. For instance, I am starting on the Horizontal Stabilizers and Elevators. Where the Elevator, meets the Horizontal Stabilizer and pivots into Horizontal Stabilizer; Should they be the same level. Meaning building up the Elevator with Micro, or should the Elevator be at the level that they meet... About 3/16" lower. On one hand it seams aerodynamically the build up and leveling will not create as much air flow disturbance, but at the same time adding all that Micro would be extra weight? Thanks Kevin Kossi Legacy 72% New York