Kevin,
From reading your message, I believe you may have some things regarding
feathering props backwards/confused. I sent this off-list - feel free to
circulate it if you want. Or reply directly if you think I missed something
or have other questions. Hope this helps...
On light twins, (and other normal feathering props), the prop "rests" in the
feathered position - i.e. if there is no oil pressure, the prop will
automatically feather. The oil pressure is used to bring the out of feather
(oil is used to move from high pitch (feather) to low pitch) - which is
opposite a normal (non-feathering) prop.
The high pressure accumulator (reservoir) is used to momentarily bring the
prop "out of feather" if no engine oil pressure is available, which is used
for re-starts in the air after an engine has been shutdown and the prop
feathered. Note: completely shutting down one engine and feathering the
prop is a commonly practiced maneuver in a twin. Without the accumulator,
there would be no way to get the prop out of feather after a engine has shut
down and thus a wind-milling re-start would be impossible.
If you look at most light twins sitting on the ramp, you might notice that
the props are not in the full feather position. You might think to
yourself: "if the prop rests in the feathered position with no oil pressure,
then why isn't it feathered while sitting on the ramp?" The reason is,
because that would make it hard to start on the ground (a feathered prop
"beats" at the air). So, to prevent the prop from moving to the feathered
position during normal engine shutdown (on the ground), the prop has small
centrifugal "pins" which automatically drop into position during low rpm's
(i.e. ground shutdown) and prevent the prop from feathering (unless it's
already feathered). Note: this is important to know during an engine out
scenario on a twin, because you have to move the prop lever to the feathered
position before the prop slows down. Otherwise, the lock-out pins will
engage and prevent the prop from falling into the feathered position (even
though that is the normal resting (i.e. no oil pressure) state.
Interestingly, if you look as most dual stage Twin Gas Turbine planes (i.e.
a King Air), while sitting on the ramp, you'll notice the props are
feathered. This is because they do not have the feather lock-out pins.
They don't need them because the prop is not directly/mechanically connected
to the engine's primary compressor/turbine shaft. Rather, the prop is only
"air coupled" via a 2nd'ary prop turbine (in the engine). Thus, during a
start operation the prop still spins freely (from the primary turbine shaft)
and does not create appreciable back pressure even though it is in the
feathered state (beating the air).
"Counterweighted" props are a bit of as hybrid. They are "limited" so as to
not move (in pitch) all the way to the feathered state (otherwise they would
be a feathering prop). However, they "act" like a feathering prop in that
the prop "rests" in the high pitch position (with no oil pressure), which is
opposite from a normal variable-pitch prop. They typically do not have
accumulators since the prop does not go all the way to the feathering
position - i.e. there is not need to get them back out of feather. However,
without oil pressure the prop will always be at the high pitch position.
They typically also do not have feather lock-out pins, since they do not go
all the way to feather. You can see this by looking at a counterweighted
prop sitting on the ramp. It will be at high pitch, whereas all others will
be at low pitch (i.e. flat). Thus, (in theory) a counterweighted prop will
be harder to start since the starter has to push more air (via the high
pitch prop) during the starting operation. After the engine starts and oil
pressure is available the prop will move to low pitch (if the controls are
positioned that way).
The upside of a counterweighted prop over a feathering prop is that it is
simpler and thus usually lighter and cheaper. The high pitch position
offers only slightly more drag than feathered (especially if you can slow
the plane enough to get the prop to stop windmilling). In a twin the
asymmetric drag can be a killer and thus they go for full feather. In a
single, it's just "incremental" glide distance, which is not really "free"
considering the weight and cost.
The upside of a counterweighted prop over a normal variable pitch-prop is
that if the engine or governor fails (no oil pressure) the prop will
automatically move to the high pitch position (less wind-milling drag and
thus better glide). However, the downsides are 1. theoretically harder to
start (minimal), 2. typically a bit heavier, 3. If the governor fails (or
the engine losses oil pressure) on take-off the prop will go to high pitch -
which is typically not what you want and depending on the engine may give
very poor takeoff/flight performance.
This last emergency scenario (downside #3) does not occur with a normal
variable pitch prop - since it would go the other way (to low pitch) which
is what you normally want at takeoff and is easy/safe to fly the pattern and
return to the runway. Note: if the engine completely fails the advantage
switches back to the counterweighted prop - better glide.
Tradeoffs, Tradeoffs :-)
Rick Titsworth
ES/TSIO550 - building (with an MT counterweighted prop)
-----Original Message-----
Kossi
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:05 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Prop Feathering
Does anyone have any experience with the use of pressure reservoirs
to place a Prop. in full feathering mode when you have an engine
failure or loss of oil pressure?
I am thinking about purchasing a Hartzell for my Legacy but that
model is not offered with counter weights or a full feathering option.
I heard that one can install a pressure tank to store oil pressure,
kind of like a well tank. The tanks has a bladder or piston and
spring to store the energy that you can use to feather the prop when
all else fails by opening a valve.
Thanks
Kevin Kossi
New York
Legacy 70%
--