Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:56:15 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1492836@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.192.83; envelope-from=erosiak@comcast.net
From: erosiak@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Builder's Insurance

I used Avemco the first year (2001-2002) for my ES. After a trouble free year, they declined to renew not because there was any issue with myself or Lancair ES's. I was advised they were concerned about composites. At the time they were EAA's choice insurance vendor and they were cherry picking what aircraft they would insure (they also refused RV's at the time). Many, many of us contacted EAA directly to complain and EAA after studying the problem did the right thing by dropping them.

I would never consider them again even for a spam can.

Ed Rosiak


 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Christopher Zavatson" <Christopher.Zavatson@baesystems.com>
> It is interesting to see how varied the experiences with the same
> company can be.  I just renewed the coverage on my 360 with Avemco this
> last week.  I haven't been able to find another company that would match
> the coverage without a bunch of exclusions I didn't like.  I would
> really like to know what formula these guys use to figure who they will
> insure and for how much.
> 
> Chris Zavatson
> N91CZ
> L360std
> www.N91CZ.com
> 
> 
> 
> Christopher Zavatson
> BAE Systems
> (408)289-4329
> 
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/