X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:54:16 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mis005.exch005intermedia.net ([64.78.61.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.0) with ESMTP id 1491817 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:14:29 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.78.61.14; envelope-from=johnwcox@pacificnw.com Received: from ehost005-2.exch005intermedia.net ([64.78.21.103]) by mis005.exch005intermedia.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:14:08 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C6F56E.FD80BC61" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Hartzell Composite Prop. X-Original-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:14:07 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Hartzell Composite Prop. Thread-Index: Acb1XR54JznIh+ztTHK3DBjGjMv1JQAEUeaQ From: "John W. Cox" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Return-Path: johnwcox@pacificnw.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2006 00:14:08.0344 (UTC) FILETIME=[FE02C580:01C6F56E] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6F56E.FD80BC61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Peter, if you speak to Hartzell again. Mention that there are 675 RV-10s in the lower speed range that are salivating at the prospect of a composite 3 blade rather than the MT or their two blade metal prop (C2YR-1BF/F8068D. I know its blasphemy here to mention such a thing but they might just wake up and do more research. Options are always a good thing. =20 John Cox =20 ________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of PJHWFD@aol.com Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 3:06 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Hartzell Composite Prop. =20 Kevin I spoke to Hartzell. 76" diameter Vs 72" for the Legacy. Also set up for a slower speed range than the Legacy. They did say they were looking for other applications for this technology and may consider the Legacy but I doubt the production numbers would work for them. =20 =20 Peter Hebert N23PH LEG2/G pjhwfd@aol.com ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6F56E.FD80BC61 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Peter, if you speak to Hartzell = again. Mention that there are 675 RV-10s in the lower speed range that are = salivating at the prospect of a composite 3 blade rather than the MT or their two = blade metal prop (C2YR-1BF/F8068D. I know its blasphemy here to mention = such a thing but they might just wake up and do more research. Options are = always a good thing.

John Cox

From: Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of PJHWFD@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, October = 21, 2006 3:06 PM
To: Lancair Mailing = List
Subject: [LML] Re: = Hartzell Composite Prop.

Kevin

I spoke to Hartzell. = 76" diameter Vs 72" for the Legacy. Also set up for a slower = speed range than the Legacy. They did say they were looking for other = applications for this technology and may consider the Legacy but I doubt the = production numbers would work for them.

Peter Hebert
N23PH LEG2/G
pjhwfd@aol.com

------_=_NextPart_001_01C6F56E.FD80BC61--