X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:39:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta-out-1.udlp.com ([207.109.1.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.0) with ESMTP id 1491131 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 11:21:24 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.109.1.8; envelope-from=Christopher.Zavatson@baesystems.com Received: from mnexch01.MSGDOMAIN.MPLS.UDLP.COM ([10.66.62.99]) by mta-out-1.udlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9LEV2nb016037 for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:31:02 -0500 Received: from smtp.udlp.com ([10.66.69.54] RDNS failed) by mnexch01.MSGDOMAIN.MPLS.UDLP.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:13:53 -0500 Received: from DM-MN-06-MTA by smtp.udlp.com with Novell_GroupWise; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:20:36 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.6 X-Original-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:20:25 -0500 From: "Christopher Zavatson" X-Original-To: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Builder's Insurance Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2006 15:13:53.0297 (UTC) FILETIME=[85232010:01C6F523] It is interesting to see how varied the experiences with the same company can be. I just renewed the coverage on my 360 with Avemco this last week. I haven't been able to find another company that would match the coverage without a bunch of exclusions I didn't like. I would really like to know what formula these guys use to figure who they will insure and for how much. Chris Zavatson N91CZ L360std www.N91CZ.com Christopher Zavatson BAE Systems (408)289-4329