Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #36711
From: <VTAILJEFF@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC2-handling without nose strut inflation
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:20:06 -0400
To: <lml>
In a message dated 7/13/2006 8:03:58 AM Central Standard Time, n103md@yahoo.com writes:
The functional purpose of the nose strut is :
1) to hold the wheel in the right place relative to the airframe,
2) to absorb some energy on less graceful landings, and
3) allow the nose to rise gently on takeoff so the pilot has a moment to
    find the right elevator position.

A rubber hose clamped to the strut can allow the strut to serve #1 well,
#2 adequately, and #3 not so well. In my view, that is sufficient to allow
a safe flight by someone who knows how to fly a Lancair in the first place.
Consider that many airplanes are flying with little or no shock absorption
in the nose gear. It's probably better than the rock-hard mooney donuts
that used to be on the mains of my LNC2.

If I were facing considerable inconvenience versus flying with a
deflated nose strut plus radiator hose and hose clamps, I would clamp
on the hose, and give the nose a few tugs up and down to insure
proper takeoff attitude and prop clearance. If it passed those tests,
I would fly it home. The greatest risk would be ridicule on the LML :-)
 
George Braly (privately) and I (on the lml) had this exact discussion with Shannon Knoeplfin 2 years ago. He thought that he was someone "who knew how to fly a Lancair in the first place" and decided "the considerable inconvenience" was too much to bear so he departed Oshkosh. He died less than 30 minutes later attempting an engine out landing into Madison.
 
The moral of the story is, if you are terribly inconvenienced by mechanical malfunctions  aircraft are prone to and cannot stand the thought of waiting on the ground for them to be properly repaired then you should not be a pilot.
 
Regards,
 
Jeff
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster