|
|
Posted for "Fred Moreno" <fredmoreno@optusnet.com.au>:
Rod:
Correct, I did not consider coating inside and outside. So let’s consider
it for a moment.
Wall heating from the of the exhaust manifold is primarily by means of
convective heat transfer (heat transfer through the thin boundary layer
along the wall of the tube from the hotter gases to the cooler tube wall),
not via thermal radiation from the hot gasses (which are “optically thin”
and unable to radiate much thermal energy over the short distance of the
tube diameter). There is likely a small temperature drop from interior
surface of the ceramic to the tube wall (a modest thermal insulating effect)
which would be beneficial.
But I would expect the benefit to be small, and offset by the insulating
effect of the ceramic on the outside which would raise the wall temperature
in the same way. That is, dual insulating ceramic coating (inside and out)
would seem to cancel the benefits out. Theoretically, one would put ceramic
on the interior wall only, and let the outside lose heat as rapidly as
possible to keep the wall temperature lower and gain some benefit. As noted
earlier, do not do this on your turbo airplane if you like your turbine
wheels.
Technically, it would be nice to get some real, verifiable DATA. But it
would be hard to get, requiring a before and after coating test with a
calibrated optical pyrometer to detect wall temperature while an engine is
running on a dynamometer. And calibrating the pyrometer requires detailed
knowledge of thermal emissivity of the raw exhaust manifold compared to the
ceramic coated manifold. If the ceramic has a lower thermal emissivity than
the metal, the heat transfer to the surroundings will be smaller, but the
tube wall temperature higher because of the reduced radiation heat loss.
Manifold lifetime would suffer as a result, although how much is an open
question. I merely point out that small temperature increases at these
operating temperatures can have large impact on strength, corrosion rate,
and increasing brittleness.
My view: if you like the appearance of ceramic coating on your exhaust
manifold in favour of the grey/black of the oxidized stainless, then coat
away. At least you have a chance to detect cracks and deterioration. Coat
and then inspect regularly.
At the end of the day, I think it is an issue of aesthetics and has to be
justified on that basis. As a thermal management tool, ceramic coatings on
the exhaust manifold seem to be a double edged tool. If you want thermal
management under the cowl, do it another way, or show the benefits via
verifiable data.
Fred Moreno
|
|