X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [67.8.182.29] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1c.2) with HTTP id 1232452 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:12:35 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Coating and covering exhaust manifolds To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1c.2 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:12:35 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <007101c6a4a6$73c2caf0$6501a8c0@ws1> References: <007101c6a4a6$73c2caf0$6501a8c0@ws1> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="windows-1250";format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Rod Pharis" : Fred, Your comments are technically correct. However, you appear to have not considered applying the ceramic coating to the tubing ID as well as the OD. The manifold CRES wall material should be cooler, and also radiate less. That's win-win! Rod Pharis ...snip... If you wrap or coat the exhaust manifold, the wall temperature is going to be raised, and the strength reduced. From the figures, we an see that 100-200F can make huge differences in strength. The worst thing to do is wrap the manifold with high temperature insulation of the type frequently sold for automotive use. I once saw a plane with braided stainless steel mesh over the manifold which is fairly bad. The ceramic coating probably has the least effect in increasing manifold wall temperatures, but there is still certain to be a negative effect. ...snip...