Return-Path: Received: from imo15.mx.aol.com ([198.81.17.5]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 02:20:04 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v23.6.) id kVNCa03806 (4396) for ; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 02:24:06 -0400 (EDT) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: <0.713703ce.253c1706@aol.com> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 02:24:06 EDT Subject: Lancair 360 Header Tank Fit Problems To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I never thought of cutting off the old flanges and starting over, but it definitely would work. (Bill Harrelson and Marv Kaye's solution) I spoke to Orin on the phone and he told me that he prefers the tank flange to bond to a glass-to-glass area on the forward deck. His suggestion was that I scoop out the honeycomb where necessary to achieve such a configuration and, of course, adding fiberglass to replace what was cut off before continuing. This didn't sound like a bad idea, either, and I'd like to avoid it if possible, but it sounds much easier than rebuilding the tank flange. (Not better, just easier...) How many of y'all have made the factory supplied tank work as is? Has anyone out there had one that fit just right? Related to my previous comment that the tank may not be in its original shape, I had stored the canopy frame away from the fuselage for almost a year. (I think I had the aircraft inverted for that time.) When I tried to drop it back on, it wouldn't fit -- it had to be gently forced into position. Now, I put it back on as soon as I'm done working for the day and it retains its proper shape. It's easy for me to believe that the tank has changed shape (warped, relaxed, whatever...) as well. - Rob Wolf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html