Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #35506
From: Paul Lipps <elippse@sbcglobal.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: skin heating
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:30:01 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Hi, Frederick!
    'Sorry I referred to you as Frank in the previous two postings! I have one OAT mounted behind the rear wing spar ahead of my flap for my Rocky Mountain u-monitor, and one in the tailcone above and behind the elevator spar cutout for my Dynon EFIS. Both of them agree within 1 degree C of each other in flight, and they also agree with the forecast temperature. One way to determine if you are getting stagnation rise, which I have done, is to fly slowly, say 100 mph, and record the OAT, then get up to cruise speed and see what the OAT says. I've done some data processing with downloads from some of the raceplanes and am astounded by how badly their avionics/OAT locations gives density altitude variations with airspeed changes, even though baro altitude stays the same. Klaus has his OAT flush on the skin of his EZ. In a side-by-side comparison, as we got up to speed, his corrected OAT and dalt showed a drop, since his instrument used the 80% stagnation rise estimate and his wasn't that great. My OAT never changed.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster