X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:04:32 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1075229@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <peterg@dakotacom.net>
Received: from Mail.Ultrasw.com ([66.181.240.7] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with ESMTP id 1074895 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:50:07 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.181.240.7; envelope-from=peterg@dakotacom.net
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (unverified [69.9.29.85]) by Mail.Ultrasw.com
 (Vircom SMTPRS 4.2.425.16) with ESMTP id <B0128531958@Mail.Ultrasw.com> for <lml@lancaironline.net>;
 Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:49:19 -0700
X-Modus-BlackList: 69.9.29.85=OK;peterg@dakotacom.net=OK
X-Modus-Trusted: 69.9.29.85=YES
X-Original-Message-ID: <44481E0A.5020306@dakotacom.net>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:49:30 -0700
From: peter goudinoff <peterg@dakotacom.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: inflatable canopy seal question
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On the Legacy, the plans call for the inflatable canopy seal to be 
mounted on the fuselage canopy rails.  If the seal were mounted on the 
canopy itself, it would be out of the way,  less likely to be damaged 
getting in and out or when working behind the panel.  Is there any 
reason why this shouldn't be done; anyone with any experience with it?  
Appreciate your thoughts.

Peter Goudinoff
Legacy #200