X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:48:41 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1072846@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <walter@advancedpilot.com>
Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with ESMTPS id 1072235 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:46:45 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com
Received: (qmail 11747 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2006 13:45:59 -0500
Received: from 216-107-97-170.wan.networktel.net (HELO ?10.0.1.4?) (216.107.97.170)
  by rs5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2006 13:45:59 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623)
In-Reply-To: <list-1072045@logan.com>
References: <list-1072045@logan.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-7--424965916
X-Original-Message-Id: <608c410e334cdc521b448ee949dc09c9@advancedpilot.com>
From: Walter Atkinson <walter@advancedpilot.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: TSIO-550 Turbo setup for non-pressurizedLlancairs
X-Original-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:45:58 -0500
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623)


--Apple-Mail-7--424965916
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=WINDOWS-1252;
	format=flowed


On Apr 18, 2006, at 11:26 AM, richard titsworth wrote:

Based on your knowledge of other (std) TSIO-550=92s, do you believe your=20=

21 GPH to be approx the same, better, or worst economy?


One would have to have a pretty high MP and rpm to get the mass airflow=20=

adequate to be far enough LOP for 21 gph to be a usable mixture.

A more reasonable LOP cruise FF on that engine would be 17 gph or so=20
while keeping TIT under control.

Walter=

--Apple-Mail-7--424965916
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=WINDOWS-1252



On Apr 18, 2006, at 11:26 AM, richard titsworth wrote:


=
<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>0000,0000,8080</param><x-tad=
-bigger>Based
on your knowledge of other (std) TSIO-550=92s, do you believe your 21
GPH to be approx the same, better, or worst =
economy?</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-bigger>



One would have to have a pretty high MP and rpm to get the mass
airflow adequate to be far enough LOP for 21 gph to be a usable
mixture.


A more reasonable LOP cruise FF on that engine would be 17 gph or so
while keeping TIT under control.


Walter</x-tad-bigger></color></fontfamily>=

--Apple-Mail-7--424965916--