Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:37:36 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-995099@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.82.201.14; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Roseville Glasair crash
References: <list-993833@logan.com>
From: "John Schroeder" <jschroeder@perigee.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <list-993833@logan.com>
User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3929)

Barry -

My reading of Jeff's emails and the responses, thereto, on this list, is  
that he speaks very clearly and logically for a whole bunch of us. The  
tactics and approach are not counterproductive. I prefer to classify it as  
a plea to the community of Lancair builders and flyers to reflect a bit on  
their flying - to see if there are things to work on. And there are.

It took a hard-nosed insurance industry to nudge us in that direction.  
Whether we like it or not, I believe the insurance companies have defined  
us as a community and we all pay a significant price for that. In the  
minds of fellow citizens in the Sacramento area, I also believe this  
accident may have expanded it to the entire experimental community. My  
judgment? The trend is ominous.

Regards,

John Schroeder
==================================================
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:53:49 -0500, Barry Hancock <sportform@cox.net>  
wrote:

> Jeff, the reason that I and many others have tried to get you to look at  
> this is not some self-serving vendetta. Rather, it is because we realize  
> that your heart is in the right place and your passion is clear.  We  
> would likeyou to consider your tactics and approach so that it has the  
> impact we would all like it to have.

--