X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:53:49 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-993815@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <sportform@cox.net>
Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8)
  with ESMTP id 992991 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:29:39 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.33; envelope-from=sportform@cox.net
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (really [70.187.129.106]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
          id <20060221172518.SQRY20050.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@[10.0.1.3]>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:25:18 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623)
In-Reply-To: <list-989904@logan.com>
References: <list-989904@logan.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-193--973028543
X-Original-Message-Id: <6c24d16edde991bc6ab19e621e71e8e7@cox.net>
From: Barry Hancock <sportform@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Roseville Glasair crash
X-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:28:48 -0800
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623)


--Apple-Mail-193--973028543
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format=flowed


On Feb 17, 2006, at 10:51 PM, VTAILJEFF@aol.com wrote:

> If you do not think=A0regulations and advisory material does not apply=20=

> to you-- then fine, good luck.
> =A0
> Jeff

This is exactly what I'm talking about and what others like Lynn have=20
tried to point out.  Namely that it is fine to talk about a specific=20
point, but when you make ridiculous suggestions and/or use data having=20=

nothing to do with the original point and try to make broad reaching=20
analogies, it looses it's impact.  To say what the guy in the Glasair=20
did was stupid is correct, though I don't know anyone on this list that=20=

didn't already know that.  To associate that crash with previous=20
discussions about pattern entry just serves to water down the impact=20
you're trying to have.

Jeff, the reason that I and many others have tried to get you to look=20
at this is not some self-serving vendetta.  Rather, it is because we=20
realize that your heart is in the right place and your passion is=20
clear.  We would like you to consider your tactics and approach so that=20=

it has the impact we would all like it to have.

You can have an impact without being abrasive, you can be heard without=20=

shocking people, and you can accomplish your goals without loosing a=20
significant part of your audience.  A good communicator is concerned=20
with how the message is received....

Barry

--Apple-Mail-193--973028543
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=ISO-8859-1



On Feb 17, 2006, at 10:51 PM, VTAILJEFF@aol.com wrote:


<excerpt><fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>If you do not
think=A0regulations and advisory material does not apply to you-- then
fine, good luck.</smaller></fontfamily>

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>=A0</smaller></fontfamily>

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Jeff

</smaller></fontfamily></excerpt>

This is exactly what I'm talking about and what others like Lynn have
tried to point out.  Namely that it is fine to talk about a specific
point, but when you make ridiculous suggestions and/or use data having
nothing to do with the original point and try to make broad reaching
analogies, it looses it's impact.  To say what the guy in the Glasair
did was stupid is correct, though I don't know anyone on this list
that didn't already know that.  To associate that crash with previous
discussions about pattern entry just serves to water down the impact
you're trying to have. =20


Jeff, the reason that I and many others have tried to get you to look
at this is not some self-serving vendetta.  Rather, it is because we
realize that your heart is in the right place and your passion is
clear.  We would like you to consider your tactics and approach so
that it has the impact we would all like it to have. =20


You can have an impact without being abrasive, you can be heard
without shocking people, and you can accomplish your goals without
loosing a significant part of your audience.  A good communicator is
concerned with how the message is received....


Barry


--Apple-Mail-193--973028543--