X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:44:09 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mxsf08.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.208] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 990890 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:18:48 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.28.208; envelope-from=farnsworth@charter.net Received: from mxip31a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip31a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.246]) by mxsf08.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1JGHtlf002314 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:17:56 -0500 Received: from 71-12-160-183.dhcp.gwnt.ga.charter.com (HELO Farnsworth) ([71.12.160.183]) by mxip31a.cluster1.charter.net with SMTP; 19 Feb 2006 11:17:20 -0500 From: "Farnsworth" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: RE: [LML] Pilot Decision Making X-Original-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:17:32 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 It is interesting to see how this subject has evolved from someone making a comment about how he makes the transition from high altitude flight to the traffic pattern; he explained getting his airplane slowed to configuration airspeed was done by flying down the runway and then flying a closed traffic pattern. This allowed him to descend at a controlled rate, didn't shock cool his engine, and entered traffic without conflicting with other traffic. The initial "outcry" was he was "shining his ass", breaking FAA regs, endangering himself and everyone around him, and most likely will end killing someone and raising everyone's insurance rates. Then someone compared it to using undocumented parts on airplanes. Now with the Glassair accident, some people are pointing out what happens when you "shine your ass". When someone does breaks the laws of physics and aerodynamics that someone will pay a price. If I followed the guidance of the "outcry" group who said you can't fly straight in because there might be someone in the pattern without a radio, then I guess a practice ILS, VOR, or GPS approach can't be done for the same reason. This latest accident has absolutely nothing to do with the original subject. There is NOTHING inherently unsafe about flying a straight in low approach to a closed full stop landing, if you fly within the bounds of physics and aerodynamics. I too believe in flying safely. Since there is a saying that "there are bold pilots and there are old pilots, but there are no old, bold pilots". Since I'm old, that must mean I'm not a bold pilot. I don't consider what I do at the Reno Air Races as "shining my ass", but from some of the comments made in this frame there are probably those who think I'm not setting a good example to those who happened to observe me flying. Know the limits of yourself and your airplane, then back off from those limits for safety. Lynn Farnsworth Super Legacy #235 TSIO-550 powered Race #44