X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:25:53 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from wind.imbris.com ([216.18.130.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTPS id 985766 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:09:52 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.18.130.7; envelope-from=hwasti@starband.net Received: from starband.net (vsat-148-64-23-255.c050.t7.mrt.starband.net [148.64.23.255]) (authenticated bits=0) by wind.imbris.com (8.12.11/8.12.11.S) with ESMTP id k1FB8wSk044960 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:09:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hwasti@starband.net) X-Original-Message-ID: <43F30BC1.9000605@starband.net> X-Original-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:08:49 -0800 From: "Hamid A. Wasti" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Roseville Glasair crash References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Posted for "Tom Gourley" : > > I don't see how you can draw a parallel between a pilot with > incredibly poor > judgement stunting over a residential area, nowhere near a traffic > pattern, > and getting in way over his head, with executing a planned manuever to > landing. I am sure if you had had a discussion with the deceased pilot just before that flight, he would have expressed the same sentiments -- how can you compare my well planned actions, taken for the good of the general public who will get a free and exciting airshow right in their homes, with the actions of those irresponsible pilots that have crashed doing stupid things. And one more point: Since you make a point of it being nowhere near a traffic pattern, would the same stunts done in a traffic pattern meet your approval? Regards, Hamid