In a message dated 10/30/2005 8:53:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
spry@ihug.co.nz writes:
My
friend Simon Creasey was badly burned in a fire the occurred in his LNC2
on
attempting a forced landing a week ago after (we think) engine
problems.He
is still in an induced coma and will continue to be so for some
weeks yet
while the repair process proceeds.
He was attempting a forced landing
and apparently clipped some unseen power
wires at the last moment turning
what would have been "just another day at
the office" into a disaster.
Simon's plane had a header tank, and it has got me wondering about
the
wisdom of that configuration.
Sorry to hear of Simon's plight. I hope his recovery goes well.
While you did not give any indication of what started the fire, remember
that there are many ways that fires can start.
I have heard of nose gear collapses on landing where the front or bottom
mounted throttle body/carb connections were ripped free and the spilled gas was
ignited. This could have possibly been avoided by shutting
the cockpit fuel valve - usually not done close to landing.
Almost every LNC2 has fuel lines running thru the cockpit, even if the
engine is fed directly from the wing, and it is possible to
rupture such lines during an accident - especially if they are
LNC2 original equipment Tygon tubing.
There are many standard certified planes with header tanks or overhead
tanks and I don't think there is any greater risk from these than other
configurations where fuel related fires are started by an accident.
I know you titled this "Cabin Fire", but is that where it started?
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL
(KARR)