X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:05:47 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-781309@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <limadelta@gmail.com>
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.199] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c6)
  with ESMTP id 781290 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:01:27 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.249.82.199; envelope-from=limadelta@gmail.com
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h30so21719wxd
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=cFOjHDyGlcoqjl2g0UPwJO//Z9cMbmiuVw7t8KyJv5FsfZaNe4T4kklF4Y45z11Gzojpwr2c6mOUQ37ugNjpZvLlQJl+4jQCdfS9bUnVVPRD5QgYoY7uRYBfNTCAmFFCoWhJVOjhgOhRNeZbptgtyvaVE7QYIoy+ZfFkvkTySLw=
Received: by 10.70.118.3 with SMTP id q3mr3254606wxc;
        Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.71.14 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: <aa29b7b80510231900q30164662ie19ac1ff0b6221d0@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:00:33 -0400
From: Dan O'Brien <limadelta@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: lml_Web_Archive
In-Reply-To: <list-780794@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_43398_11943556.1130119233272"
References: <list-780794@logan.com>

------=_Part_43398_11943556.1130119233272
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Jonathan,

I second the thanks. For those of us who can't say we've progressed to the
the refresher stage on engines, i.e., for whom the inner workings of the
engine are still pretty mysterious, the explanation was helpful for
understanding the implications of timing for cyllinder pressure and why CHT
and EGT behave the way they do.

Dan O'Brien

On 10/23/05, John Schroeder <jschroeder@perigee.net> wrote:
>
> Jonathan-
>
> Thank you for the great refresher on timing, Theta PP, et. al.
>
> John Schroeder
>
>
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
>

------=_Part_43398_11943556.1130119233272
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Jonathan,<br>
<br>
I second the thanks.&nbsp; For those of us who can't say we've
progressed to the the refresher stage on engines, i.e., for whom the
inner workings of the engine are still pretty mysterious, the
explanation was helpful for understanding the implications of timing
for cyllinder pressure and why CHT and EGT behave the way they do.<br>
<br>
Dan O'Brien<br><br><div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 10/23/05, <b class=
=3D"gmail_sendername">John Schroeder</b> &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jschroeder@p=
erigee.net">jschroeder@perigee.net</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin=
: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Jonathan-<br><br>Thank you for the great refresher on timing, Theta PP,&nbs=
p;&nbsp;et. al.<br><br>John Schroeder<br><br><br>--<br>For archives and uns=
ub <a href=3D"http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/">http://mail.lancair=
online.net/lists/lml/
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_43398_11943556.1130119233272--