X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:49:06 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 727953 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:44:43 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.27; envelope-from=rickschrameck@cox.net Received: from [192.168.1.101] (really [68.108.32.101]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20050920174356.BMGQ26890.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@[192.168.1.101]> for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:43:56 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <43304A5C.5070502@cox.net> X-Original-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:43:56 -0700 From: Rick Schrameck User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: FAA trying to stop us my .02 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks John, I think we all should contact thee EAA for help it may be the only time we may have a voice in our future as builders and manufactures Rick John Schroeder wrote: > Rick - > > As I understand it, the FAA has chosen to publish the document in the > Federal Register. My guess is that they are very much aware that it > has raised a lot of concerns and are now treating it as a >