From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: FAA trying to stop us my .02
To: lml
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:41:37 -0400
Message-ID: <web-727759@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <9F819487C44F0B4DBDB0CC0450824CEB019B54B7@ehost005-2.exch005intermedia.net>
References: <9F819487C44F0B4DBDB0CC0450824CEB019B54B7@ehost005-2.exch005intermedia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "John W. Cox" <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>:

  Scott, my point which obviously was not clear enough (in a previous
  post) is that an O & P session by the DAR with the kit purchaser (upon
  completion) could clearly and demonstrably indicate the level of
  education obtained.  I would like to think that the enjoyment factor
  after Carl's team investment in both substantial time and significant
  money would be in the affirmative... thereby meeting the Spirit and
  Intent of the AC.
  
  Now as to this kit, failing to meet or crossing some bureaucratic line
  in Seattle's MIDO play box sand... I think political influence or sheer
  patience for positive movement may be a painful result.
  
  So it may well prove that the Certified Turbojet Manufacturers
  referenced fear about this 5+ seat kit, is the principal reason that the
  sky is about to fall.
  
  One set of rules, one standard with equitable application to all, would
  be a fine place to start.

  I am personally impressed with an effort to take all those P&W
  powerplants from the graveyard of aviation progress and place them back
  into good use flying the friendly skies.
  
  John