X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [65.173.216.67] (account rob HELO [149.59.216.12]) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTPSA id 726552 for lml@lancair.net; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:19:36 -0400 Message-ID: <432EE4EC.6090902@Philips.com> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:18:52 -0400 From: Rob Logan Reply-To: Rob@Logan.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lml@lancair.net Subject: Re: FAA Trying to stop us all? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > The MIDO defined "major portion" as time not task and said to Carl and I > that the 8000-38 form is simplistic and they were not going to use task. that's not per their own rules? I'm confused... if kit_on_approved_list then if options_not_on_approved_list_bill_of_sale then look_close ; IVP door if extra_help then look_close ; builders_week issue_exp_airworthy else look_close_at_8000-38 issue_exp_airworthy fi I thought the kit approved list http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/rec/ultralights/amateur_built/kits/media/ama-kit.pdf was "approved data" for Order 8130.2 and form 8000-38 so the kit buyer didn't have to fill out 8000-38? how can government make a change without due process? old IVP wing http://rob.com/mahar/ryan/wing.jpg legacy wing http://rob.com/lancair/BuildersWeek/day1/wings1.jpg both are "tasked" as builder made per FAA's kit approved list. http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/rec/ultralights/amateur_built/amateur_regs/