X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 01:25:25 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp.perigee.net ([166.82.201.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 700489 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:05:13 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.82.201.14; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net Received: from john-study.home_wireless (dsl-208-26-41-166.perigee.net [208.26.41.166]) by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j82M4RMi010215 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 18:04:30 -0400 Subject: Fwd: [LML] Re: airspeed on final References: X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:04:27 -0400 From: "John Schroeder" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3929) Joe - This is not much in the way of real evidence for connecting slower final approach speeds to gear collapses. An equally valid hypothesis is that the trouble is in Lancair's design of the landing gear itself!! Both need a lot more research before they can be stated as conclusions. Cheers, John From: "Joe Rodriguez" To: "Lancair Mailing List" ... I was told this by Lance and Don Goetz. ... From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of John Schroeder Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 8:19 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: airspeed on final Joe - Is there a data set or research that leads to this conclusion? Thanks, John Schroeder ES - 90% On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:15:39 -0400, Joe Rodriguez wrote: > Look at the number of gear collapses on landings. These are the guys > that think slow is better. --