Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 17:42:05 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-700468@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.127.245.25; envelope-from=Joe@goldenchoice.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: airspeed on final
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: airspeed on final
Thread-Index: AcWvbXUDoRcVdYDMTJOCEVaqilNkMwAkNoLw
From: "Joe Rodriguez" <Joe@goldenchoice.com>

I was told this by Lance and Don Goetz.  Don was at one time the Chief
pilot and test pilot for Lancair.  Many of the collapsed gear incidences
go unreported.  The bottom line is to fly whichever way seems safe to
each individual pilot.  Actually, I really don't even look much at my
airspeed indicator in VFR conditions, the airplane just sets up nice at
the speeds we have been talking about.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
John Schroeder
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 8:19 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: airspeed on final

Joe -

Is there a data set or research that leads to this conclusion?

Thanks,

John Schroeder
ES - 90%


On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:15:39 -0400, Joe Rodriguez <Joe@goldenchoice.com>

wrote:

>  Look at the number of gear collapses on landings.  These are the guys

> that think slow is better.


--=20
=20


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/