X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:34:50 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mis005.exch005intermedia.net ([64.78.61.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTP id 689028 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:22:20 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.78.61.14; envelope-from=johnwcox@pacificnw.com Received: from ehost005-2.exch005intermedia.net ([64.78.21.103]) by mis005.exch005intermedia.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 08:21:34 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5AF08.D03FB421" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: airspeed on final X-Original-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 08:21:23 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <9F819487C44F0B4DBDB0CC0450824CEB019B544C@ehost005-2.exch005intermedia.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: airspeed on final thread-index: AcWu9ROSf8zbBEjIQCmB7xTq09WE1QAE11hA From: "John W. Cox" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Return-Path: johnwcox@pacificnw.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Sep 2005 15:21:34.0620 (UTC) FILETIME=[D6AD2DC0:01C5AF08] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5AF08.D03FB421 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Barry, come up to Redmond and sit with me tomorrow. Pete can give it to you direct at the Lancair High Performance Recurrent Training at the Comfort Inn. We can even talk Red Star on the breaks and at lunch. =20 John Cox - "Foto" =20 ________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Barry Hancock Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 6:00 AM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: airspeed on final =20 If you do not have absolute confidence in being able to safely perform a go-around in the Legacy from 1.2-1.3 Vso with all that excess thrust, you may want to reconsider flying it. The "added" safety of flying at 1.5-1.6 Vso I keep hearing about presents it's own set of hazards (running down planes in the pattern, etc.). While I sure don't have tons of time flying razor wing aircraft like some guys on this list, I have never heard of such a standard practice in any other high performance airplane.=20 =20 I would love to hear what Pete Z. and other "high performance" pros have to say on this issue...=20 =20 Cheers,=20 =20 Barry ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5AF08.D03FB421 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Barry, come up to Redmond and sit = with me tomorrow. Pete can give it to you direct at the Lancair High = Performance Recurrent Training at the Comfort Inn. We can even talk Red Star = on the breaks and at lunch.

John Cox – = “Foto”

From: Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of Barry Hancock
Sent: Thursday, September = 01, 2005 6:00 AM
To: Lancair Mailing = List
Subject: [LML] Re: = airspeed on final

If you do not have absolute confidence in = being able to safely perform a go-around in the Legacy from 1.2-1.3 Vso with all = that excess thrust, you may want to reconsider flying it. The = "added" safety of flying at 1.5-1.6 Vso I keep hearing about presents it's own = set of hazards (running down planes in the pattern, etc.). While I sure don't = have tons of time flying razor wing aircraft like some guys on this list, I = have never heard of such a standard practice in any other high performance = airplane.

I would love to hear what Pete Z. and other = "high performance" pros have to say on this issue...

Cheers,

Barry

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5AF08.D03FB421--