X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:30:59 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-689048@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <jschroeder@perigee.net>
Received: from smtp.perigee.net ([166.82.201.14] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1)
  with ESMTP id 688911 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:20:06 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.82.201.14; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net
Received: from john-study.home_wireless (dsl-208-26-41-166.perigee.net [208.26.41.166])
	by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j81DJMMg016718
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:19:22 -0400
X-Original-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:19:35 -0400
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Carl's inviolable rules
References: <list-688896@logan.com>
From: "John Schroeder" <jschroeder@perigee.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Message-ID: <opswfdyxnaoo3lez@john-study.home_wireless>
In-Reply-To: <list-688896@logan.com>
User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3929)

Carl -

Your list is the best I have seen in all of this discussion. It lays out  
the rules and some very good guidance about bringing judgment into a  
situation. Since I am in a partnership, it might be a good idea to agree  
to incorporate it into the agreement. Thank you very much for taking the  
time to write it down.

Cheers,

John




  Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:02:17 -0400, Carl Cadwell <CarlC@Cadwell.com> wrote:

> I really appreciated the discussion on affective learning and good
> decisions and realized that I do have the second flight manual that I do
> not violate.  Here they are in a brain dump:
>
> Carl's inviolatable rules of flying:
>




--