X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:35:54 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [204.127.198.39] (HELO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTP id 687495 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:12:05 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.198.39; envelope-from=mjrav@comcast.net Received: from mark1 (c-65-96-140-242.hsd1.ma.comcast.net[65.96.140.242]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2005083102111001500j4ua0e>; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:11:10 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <005901c5add2$80013f70$f28c6041@mark1> From: "Mark Ravinski" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: airspeed on final X-Original-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:20:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0056_01C5ADB0.F88C49C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0056_01C5ADB0.F88C49C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What we see on our "experimental" airspeed indicators is not what is = important. I know my indicator is not particularly accurate in most = phases of flight. Installation problems I'm sure. Mark Ravinski N360KB 1356 hrs ------=_NextPart_000_0056_01C5ADB0.F88C49C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

What we see on our "experimental" = airspeed=20 indicators is not what is important. I know my indicator is not=20 particularly accurate in most phases of flight.

Installation problems I'm = sure.

Mark Ravinski

N360KB 1356 hrs

------=_NextPart_000_0056_01C5ADB0.F88C49C0--