X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:45:58 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-687326@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <gtanner@bendcable.com>
Received: from bcsmtp2.bendcable.com ([216.228.160.32] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1)
  with ESMTP id 686340 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:49:19 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.228.160.32; envelope-from=gtanner@bendcable.com
Received: from greg (unverified [216.228.170.38]) by bendcable.com
 (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.1.16) with SMTP id <B0007662952@bcsmtp2.bendcable.com> for <lml@lancaironline.net>;
 Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:43:43 -0700
Reply-To: <gtanner@bendcable.com>
From: "Greg Tanner" <gtanner@bendcable.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Header tank leak
X-Original-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:52:27 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID: <NKBBJIIDMENNHPMFPIFCMENMCBAA.gtanner@bendcable.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <list-686074@logan.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Importance: Normal


I've received some pretty good suggestions and the vacuum idea would be
great except for the location. Since the leak is between the header and the
firewall, I have about 1/4" (maybe 3/8") gap between the two. There is no
way I can think of to get any epoxy up to the offending area to the outside
of the header. I can only see the viable option of cutting a hole through
the top.

Greg