X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:28:01 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.4.35.185] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTP id 682308 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:52:41 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.4.35.185; envelope-from=gary21sn@hotmail.com Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:51:57 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Received: from 71.34.244.118 by BAY12-DAV11.phx.gbl with DAV; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:51:57 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [71.34.244.118] X-Originating-Email: [gary21sn@hotmail.com] X-Sender: gary21sn@hotmail.com From: "Gary Edwards" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: Lancair Accident Info X-Original-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:51:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00BE_01C5A99D.AE97A2E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.10.0011.1703 Seal-Send-Time: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:51:55 -0700 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Aug 2005 00:51:57.0438 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C2C89E0:01C5A9D8] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00BE_01C5A99D.AE97A2E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable overall 53/930 5.7% =20 We could do better Yikes, doesn't look good, does it?... The information is real neat except I suspect all that information is = not very accurate since there probably are a lot of builders who didn't = use the word Lancair or the model designation in their registration. If = so, that would raise the number of planes and lower the accident = percentage. After all, when you build the plane, the parts may start out as a = Lancair, but when it is built it is an Edwards or a Krueger, or an = Argente, etc., or whoever built it. Although, you could call it = anything you want. =20 As an example, my plane registration does not have the word Lancair in = it. And its model may or may not come up, as its kit model designation = is only a part of the registered model number. Gary Edwards LNC2 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_00BE_01C5A99D.AE97A2E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable overall      = 53/930   =20 5.7%
 
We could do better


Yikes, doesn't look good, does = it?...
 
 
The = information is real=20 neat except I suspect all that information is not very accurate since = there=20 probably are a lot of builders who didn't use the word Lancair or the=20 model designation in their registration.  If so, that would = raise the=20 number of planes and lower the accident percentage.
 
After all, = when you build=20 the plane, the parts may start out as a Lancair, but when it is built it = is an=20 Edwards or a Krueger, or an Argente, etc., or whoever built = it. =20 Although, you could call it anything you want. 
 
As an = example, my plane=20 registration does not have the word Lancair in it.  And its model = may or=20 may not come up, as its kit model designation is only a part of the = registered=20 model number.
 
Gary = Edwards
LNC2    

 ------=_NextPart_000_00BE_01C5A99D.AE97A2E0--