X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:37:58 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [67.134.164.3] (HELO skywerx.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTPS id 681452 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:43:00 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=67.134.164.3; envelope-from=aflyer@lazy8.net Received: from [192.168.0.105] (huft.skywerx.com [10.10.0.124]) by skywerx.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j7PDg9qH003587 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 07:42:10 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <430DCAC1.2030206@lazy8.net> X-Original-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 07:42:25 -0600 From: John Huft User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Legacy stalls Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.7 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on skywerx.com X-Skywerx-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Skywerx-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: aflyer@lazy8.net When I took a test ride in the Legacy at Sun n Fun, we did several stalls at altitude. I felt this was one of the important things for me to test personally, based on things I had heard and read on this list. My pilot, Mel, told me that the following week an aerodynamics expert was due to spend time at Lancair to attempt to tame the stall characteristics with stall strips, VGs or some other tweek. I am wondering if anyone here has any info on the results of this effort? I decided not to buy a kit at that time, due to my experience on that test ride. John Huft