X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:45:26 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTP id 680442 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:44:20 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.158.62.67; envelope-from=cfi@instructor.net Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id 3AB8F1800125 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:43:35 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.55) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 24 Aug 2005 15:43:35 -0000 Received: by ws1-3.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2A200101D9; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:43:35 +0000 (GMT) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_112489821519314" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Ron Galbraith" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:43:35 -0700 Subject: flying into Thunderstorms Received: from [162.58.35.101] by ws1-3.us4.outblaze.com with http for cfi@instructor.net; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:43:35 -0700 X-Originating-Ip: 162.58.35.101 X-Originating-Server: ws1-3.us4.outblaze.com X-Original-Message-Id: <20050824154335.2A200101D9@ws1-3.us4.outblaze.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_----------=_112489821519314 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I posted a picture of a line of thunderstorms a couple of days ago that was displayed on an ARTCC scope. I just wanted to relate to you all what else happened that night. Just after I posted that picture I was working the sector just East of that line of weather when I took a handoff from another sector of a C421 at FL180. I asked him if he knew about the weather ahead that he was headed right for the middle of, and he indicated that he didn't know about it, but that he was listening to other A/C talk about it. He had departed about 30 minutes earlier, so he could not possibly have gotten a weather briefing. I urged him to deviate or land and wait it out on numerous occasions. I issued him my required weather statement several times, and told him that all aircraft had been deviating way South of his course. At one point he was pretty arrogant and stated that he had on board weather radar and that he would be fine. This is exactly the problem we are having with most of the weather related accidents. This fellow has probably read all the NTSB reports, and says "that will never happen to me". Once again, he did indeed make it through the storm further re-enforcing his belief that it is ok for him to fly into known bad weather. The only way he will ever change his thinking is with risk management training. There were at least 40 airline jets that would not get close to that weather, and numerous bizjets that diverted even further away from it, all within the time I was talking to the C421. I guess he really needed to get to COS that night. Yes, it was also night.=20 Ron Galbraith --=20 ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm --_----------=_112489821519314 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"

I posted a picture of a line of thunderstorms a couple of days ago that = was displayed on an ARTCC scope.   I just wanted to relate to you= all what else happened that night.  Just after I posted that picture = I was working the sector just East of that line of weather when I took a ha= ndoff  from another sector of a C421 at FL180.   I asked him= if he knew about the weather ahead that he was headed right for the middle= of, and he indicated that he didn't know about it, but that he was listeni= ng to other A/C talk about it.   He had departed about 30 minutes= earlier, so he could not possibly have gotten a weather briefing.  I = urged him to deviate or land and wait it out on numerous occasions.  I= issued him my required weather statement several times, and told him that = all aircraft had been deviating way South of his course.  At one point= he was pretty arrogant and stated that he had on board weather radar and t= hat he would be fine.  This is exactly the problem we are having with = most of the weather related accidents.   This fellow has probably= read all the NTSB reports, and says "that will never happen to me". &= nbsp; Once again, he did indeed make it through the storm further re-enforc= ing his belief that it is ok for him to fly into known bad weather. &n= bsp; The only way he will ever change his thinking is with risk management = training.   There were at least 40 airline jets that would not ge= t close to that weather, and numerous bizjets that diverted even further aw= ay from it, all within the time I was talking to the C421.   I gu= ess he really needed to get to COS that night.    Yes, it wa= s also night. 

Ron Galbraith


--=20

___________________________________________________________
Sign-up f= or Ads Free at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=3Dsignup

--_----------=_112489821519314--