X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:37:37 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTP id 679128 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:48:28 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=skipslater@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=ad3hxMH6CybC5Q+vUye74eN0fnyukucIWicYcqSHrHNrjSzQJCc1uJhI/cZoJig3; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.116.170.125] (helo=wbs) by smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E7b03-000122-UL for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:47:44 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <003c01c5a7fa$0663e600$6401a8c0@wbs> From: "Skip Slater" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Single Pilot IFR X-Original-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:47:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-ELNK-Trace: cbee950bdf563876c8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c2609c78bf9d6c23199bbfea1d964043bf98e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.170.125 John, While I agree with your premise on good judgement, I disagree with the thought that training has little to do with it. Good judgement comes from training and experience. For example, you may have the good judgement to choose a place to put your plane down in the event of an engine failure, but without the training on how to pick a good spot in the event of an off-field landing and how to fly an optimum profile, you may not make it. Without some training in meterology, you may not be able to recognize when you're getting yourself into a really bad situation until it's too late and you have to ride it out. You're also correct that our Lancairs are very seldom the root cause of all of these accidents. But at the same time, they aren't as simple to fly as a 150, especially the high performance retracts. You may have good judgement but poor awareness of how to best fly your plane in any of a number of dicey situations and that's where training is invaluable. When the crap hits the fan is not the time to be learning the glide characteristics of your airplane and finding yourself in moderate or severe weather related turbulance isn't the time to try to figure out where to go or what kind of speed to fly. Common sense would have kept most of the Lancair accidents from happening, no doubt. But just as professional pilots must be extensively trained in every plane we're rated to fly, so should experimental pilots flying high performance aircraft be smart enough to seek at least some basic training to learn the characteristics of their plane. It can't help but make better pilots and as Don Barnes proved, it may even save your life. I've been flying for over 33 years and I learn something new every time I go to training. The guys who scare me the most are the ones who think they don't need it because they already know everything. Skip Slater