X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:24:20 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTP id 677716 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:55:56 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.157.37; envelope-from=ROGG@aol.com Received: from ROGG@aol.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r4.1.) id q.e0.1a252641 (3890) for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:55:03 -0400 (EDT) From: ROGG@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:55:03 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: bad gear switch? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1124733303" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5119 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1124733303 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ANOTHER thought is lancair changed from the .190 cu in pump ( 40 amps @ 12 vdc @ 1000 psi) to the .327 cu in pump ( 50 amps @ 12 vdc @ 1000 psi ) -------------------------------1124733303 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ANOTHER thought is lancair changed from the .190 cu in pump (=20= 40 amps @ 12 vdc @ 1000 psi) to the .327 cu in pump ( 50 amps @ 12 vdc @ 100= 0 psi ) -------------------------------1124733303--