X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop: No license found, only first 5 messages were scanned Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:17:42 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta9.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 992273 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:03:37 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.199; envelope-from=glcasey@adelphia.net Received: from worldwinds ([70.34.91.48]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050611130245.IXQF8952.mta9.adelphia.net@worldwinds> for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:02:45 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: Re: S-Tec Autopilots/KX155 Radios X-Original-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 05:56:39 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 <> There is a way around this - Use a Chrysler MAP sensor. It makes a difference which one and I don't have the part number handy, but I can get it if you like. The sensor has a different pressure port, different connector and a different mounting, but that's all small stuff for us experimental types. The Chrysler sensor has a different calibration curve, but that doesn't seem to bother the S-TEC system at all. It is much more resistant to EMI and RFI and it will run on the 9 volts that the system requires. Most 5-volt devices won't do that. I've been using one in my Cessna for a few years with no problems. Gary Casey