X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 14:31:37 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web80406.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.79.61] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with SMTP id 936954 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 08 May 2005 23:05:18 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.218.79.61; envelope-from=scott_m_richardson@sbcglobal.net X-Original-Message-ID: <20050509030434.88879.qmail@web80406.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.195.57.2] by web80406.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 08 May 2005 20:04:34 PDT X-Original-Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 20:04:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Scott Richardson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: fuel flow transducer X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii For those of you that have installed your fuel flow transducer upstream of the gascolator, have you found the need to install any sort of fuel filter? I'm using the Floscan 201B )for a RMI uMonitor) and was concerned that any largish chunks that aren't caught by the finger strainers in the header tank, might be large enough to jam the small turbine wheel in the transducer and shut down the flow. I contacted Floscan and couldn't get them to give me any sort of answer on how large a particle the transducer could tolerate. Some of the RV guys have installed fuel filters upstream which have also helped to reduce the pulses from the mechanical pump which had caused some of them to get inaccurate readings. Any of you do this? Thanks. Scott